Monday, October 11, 2010

Beverly Hills Residents Rally to Keep Fear Alive

Many Beverly Hills residents want Century City commuters to walk farther to their subway station because they don't want Metro to tunnel under Beverly Hills homes and Beverly Hills High School.
You would think Beverly Hills, California residents would take a measured and educated approach to the Westside Subway Extension that will be built through their city. But at a recent Metro hearing in B.H., reason gave way to fear-mongering about the "children" at Beverly Hills High School and the homeowners who would live above an underground subway if the alternative Constellation routes are chosen over the Santa Monica Boulevard route.

These residents are ignorantly and selfishly putting their own needs above the greater L.A. community that desperately needs better public transit. The Constellation Avenue options would bring the station closer to the heart of Century City and thereby encourage more of the thousands of office workers to commute to work by train instead of driving.

And it would make it easier for the thousands of low-wage workers who commute from the Eastside to get to their destinations in Century City. That is something these Beverly Hills residents, with their two or three luxury cars in their driveways, don't have to worry about.

But what is the real motivation behind not wanting to tunnel under Beverly Hills High School? Is it the danger of the oil wells underneath the school contaminating the facilities? I don't think so because according to Wikipedia the oil has potentially already done much damage:

"Beverly gained more notoriety when Erin Brockovich and Ed Masry announced having filed three lawsuits in 2003 and 2004 on behalf of 25, 400, and 300 (respectively) former students who attended Beverly from the 1970s until the 1990s. In April 2003, the Texas-based lawfirm of Baron & Budd partnered with the law office of Masry & Vititoe to lend its expertise in lawsuits related to health risks of volatile chemicals. The number of actual cancer claims filed in Santa Monica was ninety-four.

The lawsuits claimed that toxic fumes from the oil wells caused the former students to develop cancer. The oil wells are very close to all of Beverly's sports facilities, including the soccer field, the football field, and the racetrack. Beverly students—not just athletes but students taking required physical education classes from the 1970s until the 1990s—were required to run near the oil wells."

While the lawsuits were dismissed, it did much to tarnish the high school's reputation.

So perhaps Beverly Hills High School should be moved altogether. But wait a minute. Could the school be making a lot of money from these oil wells on their property that are pumping out 400 to 500 barrels a day? Bingo! From a 2006 ABC News Report:

"A part of what makes the school so affluent is the oil tower that casts a shadow over the football field. The school receives royalties from the well that go directly to the general fund.

'We get about $300,000 a year that goes into the general fund, which supports student programs,' Stepenosky said. 'About 85 percent of the teachers' salaries comes from the general fund as well.'"

So maybe it isn't about the health and well-being of the "children." Maybe it is about that $300,000 a year the high school gets from the toxic oil wells under the ground.

But what are the examples of subway lines underneath homes and schools that many B.H. residents so conveniently dismiss in their relentless anti-Metro media campaign?

Here is one example of the reality that it is perfectly safe to build a subway underneath homes, schools, businesses and yes, even hospitals.

The Foggy Bottom Metro Station in Washington, D.C. is located directly underneath George Washington University Hospital.

Here is the station entrance with the hospital just to the right:


And a picture of the station:

2 comments:

  1. Beverly Hills NIMBY's should learn about public transportation first, before standing up and embarrassing themselves in front of hundreds of other people, by saying things they have no idea about. Their anti-subway comments are purely laughable; I truly hope Metro Authority will have enough common sense not to take the NIMBYs' comments seriously, and will construct the subway stations where they're most needed. Subways are safe, and have always been built under all types of buildings, including schools, homes, etc. Dear Beverly Hills NIMBY's, please get out of your little car-obsessed world and learn about life.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For cryin’ out loud. No WONDER it’s taken almost 50 years to get the Wilshire subway to get this far!
    With all of these NIMBYs carrying “wolf”, I can’t imagine why any politician or transit planner in their right mind would want to deal with this!
    We have to quell this fear-raising crap. It’s down-right false and quite sickening, using the BH High kids as a scapegoat… Give me a break!
    We can’t let uneducated NIMBYs determine where the transit lines will be and how they will be constructed, no matter what the neighborhood or municipality or demographics are. PLEASE leave that to the transit planners, NOT POLITICS.
    In all cities in the world that have mature rail transit systems, the property values closest to the stations are usually 20% higher than their transit-separated brethren. So… Why is it that within the greater Los Angeles area ,the NIMBYs scared that their property values will plummet? Get with the program folks! Most normal people want to live in a transit friendly area and will pay top-dollar for the privilege!
    I am a home owner in Santa Monica, living within spitting distance of Expo’s proposed Memorial Park station. I CAN’T WAIT FOR IT TO BE UP AND RUNNING!
    WE KNOW WHERE THE STATIONS NEED TO BE. LET’S GET THE WILSHIRE SUBWAY BUILT IN OUR LIFETIMES, PLEASE!

    ReplyDelete


Enter Agent ID # 1003 on the Buy Page for 1 Free Quart.